Screening Adherence and Emotional Adjustment of Daughters of Breast Cancer Patients

Women at high risk for breast cancer oftentimes also experience psychological vulnerably related to experiences of cancer in their family, high bereavement rates and their own uncertainties regarding if and when they may develop the disease. This research sought to evaluate psychological adjustment and examine reattendance among a sample of women adhering to regular breast cancer surveillance, with a specific focus on daughters of breast cancer patients. The study described in Chapter 2 longitudinally profiled anxiety and depressive symptoms among these high-risk daughters across three consecutive surveillance appointments, and also evaluated the effects of a set of hypothesized predictors on change in symptomatology. The results showed an overall decrease in anxiety over the course of the three surveillance visits, as well as a marginally significant decrease in depressive symptoms. When the effects of moderating variables on symptom change were examined, results demonstrated that some subgroups of daughters differentially benefited from the high-risk program, with daughters whose mothers died who were older at the time of their mother’s diagnosis being the only group that did not appear to experience decreases in symptomatology. The study presented in Chapter 3 investigated psychosocial correlates of reattendance at the high-risk clinic, again focusing on daughters of breast cancer patients. Results showed that greater likelihood of reattendance was associated with hypothesized predictors, including older age, lower depressive symptoms and maternal loss to breast cancer. Moreover, mother’s survival status was found to moderate the effect of perceived risk on likelihood of reattendance such that higher perceived risk predicted increased reattendance for daughters whose mothers survived, but not those whose mothers died. Additionally, results indicated that the association between anxiety and likelihood of reattendance was non-linear in nature (inverted “U”); reattendance was more likely among daughters with moderate anxiety compared to those with low or high anxiety. Findings from these studies contribute to a greater understanding of psychological adjustment and screening adherence of women at high-risk for breast cancer and may inform the development of targeted interventions to promote screening adherence and psychosocial wellbeing among this and other vulnerable high-risk populations

Biologics May Prevent Cardiovascular Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Inhibiting Coronary Plaque Formation and Stabilizing High-Risk Lesions.

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) decrease cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and whether biologic DMARDs might have a beneficial effect on coronary plaque formation or progression.MethodsIn this single-center observational cohort study, 150 patients underwent computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary atherosclerosis (total, noncalcified, mixed/calcified, and low-attenuation plaque); 101 had repeat assessments within a mean ± SD of 6.9 ± 0.3 years to evaluate plaque progression. All CVD events were prospectively recorded, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, stroke, claudication, and hospitalization for heart failure. The Framingham-D'Agostino score was used to assess cardiovascular risk. The segment stenosis score was used to measure plaque burden. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.ResultsAfter adjustment for the segment stenosis score, the Framingham-D'Agostino score, and time-varying Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level using marginal structural models, current biologic DMARD use was associated with lower long-term CVD risk (OR 0.15 [95% CI 0.04-0.60]). Noncalcified and low-attenuation plaque presence moderated the effect of biologic DMARDs on CVD risk; specifically, biologic DMARD use was associated with lower CVD risk in patients with noncalcified or low-attenuation plaque at baseline (OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.04-0.99] and OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01-0.70], respectively), but not in those without noncalcified or low-attenuation plaque. Per-segment plaque progression analyses showed that biologic DMARD exposure was associated with transition of noncalcified to mixed/calcified plaque (OR 4.00 [95% CI 1.05-15.32]). Biologic DMARD exposure predicted a lower likelihood of new plaque forming in segments without plaque among patients without mixed/calcified plaque in other coronary segments (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.17-0.93]), but not among those with calcification. Biologic DMARD treatment also predicted low-attenuation plaque loss (P = 0.042).ConclusionOur findings indicate that in RA, biologic DMARD use is associated with reduced CVD risk, protective calcification of noncalcified lesions, and lower likelihood of new plaque formation in patients with early atherosclerosis

Latent profile analysis approach to the relationship between patient and physician global assessments of rheumatoid arthritis activity

ObjectivePatients and physicians commonly differ in their assessments of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity. Clinically meaningful discordance thresholds or validation of their ability to predict functional outcomes are lacking. We explored whether an unbiased, person-centred latent profile analysis (LPA) approach could classify cases based on patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (MDGA) assessments of RA activity. We further examined whether the LPA groups displayed greater differences in clinical outcomes compared with traditional threshold-based groups. Finally, we evaluated whether LPA yielded higher explanatory power for clinical outcomes.MethodsLPA was performed in 618 patients with established RA from a single centre. A threshold-based discordance definition was used as a comparator, with patients classified into concordant (PtGA-MDGA within ± 3 cm), positively discordant (PtGA-MDGA ≥3 cm) and negatively discordant groups (PtGA-MDGA ≤-3 cm).ResultsLPA yielded five distinct groups: low PtGA/low MDGA (35.9%), moderate PtGA/moderate MDGA (18.6%), high PtGA/high MDGA (14.7%), high PtGA/low MDGA (23.3%) and low PtGA/high MDGA (7.4%). Groups differed across clinical, physical function, pain, fatigue, health-related quality of life, work productivity and activity impairment outcomes (p<0.001). Concordance groups, in particular, displayed marked heterogeneity in outcomes depending on the magnitude of disease activity reported, with the low/low group faring the best (p<0.001). The LPA solution demonstrated superior explanatory power for all outcomes (p<0.001).ConclusionsWe confirmed the validity and advantages of LPA in characterising the relationship between PtGA and MDGA over a conventional threshold-based definition. LPA yielded optimally distinct, clinically meaningful and cohesive groupings, demonstrating superior explanatory power for disease-related outcomes of interest

Impact of Cumulative Inflammation, Cardiac Risk Factors, and Medication Exposure on Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

ObjectiveTo explore incidence and progression of coronary atherosclerosis and identify determinants in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We specifically evaluated the impact of inflammation, cardiac risk factors, duration of medication exposure, and their interactions on coronary plaque progression.MethodsOne hundred one participants with baseline coronary computed tomography angiography findings underwent follow-up assessment a mean ± SD of 83 ± 3.6 months after baseline. Plaque burden was reported as the segment involvement score (describing the number of coronary segments with plaque) and the segment stenosis score (characterizing the cumulative plaque stenosis over all evaluable segments). Plaque composition was classified as noncalcified, mixed, or calcified. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) was quantified using the Agatston method.ResultsTotal plaque increased in 48% of patients, and progression was predicted by older age, higher cumulative inflammation, and total prednisone dose (P < 0.05). CAC progressors were older, more obese, hypertensive, and had higher cumulative inflammation compared to nonprogressors (P < 0.05). Longer exposure to biologics was associated with lower likelihood of noncalcified plaque progression, lesion remodeling, and constrained CAC change in patients without baseline calcification, independent of inflammation, prednisone dose, or statin exposure (all P < 0.05). Longer statin treatment further restricted noncalcified plaque progression and attenuated the effect of inflammation on increased plaque and CAC (P < 0.05). Stringent systolic blood pressure (BP) control further weakened the effect of inflammation on total plaque progression.ConclusionInflammation was a consistent and independent predictor of coronary atherosclerosis progression in RA. It should therefore be specifically targeted toward mitigating cardiovascular risk. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, statins, and BP control may further constrain plaque progression directly or indirectly

Lipoprotein oxidation may underlie the paradoxical association of low cholesterol with coronary atherosclerotic risk in rheumatoid arthritis

Objective: To compare coronary plaque burden, proatherogenic cytokines, oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), anti-oxLDL antibodies, lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol, and their relationships in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)< 1.8 mmol/L versus > 1.8 mmol/L. Also, to study differences in inflammation and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 (PCSK9), which impacts LDL clearance, in patients with low versus high LDL-C. Methods: Computed tomography angiography evaluated coronary plaque (noncalcified, partially calcified, fully calcified, and high-risk plaque) in 150 patients from a single-center observational cohort. Ox-LDL, anti-oxLDL IgG, lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and PCSK9 were measured. Analyses adjusted for Framingham general car-diovascular risk score, statin use, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Results: Patients with LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L versus >= 1.8 mmol/L demonstrated: 1) higher likelihood of per-segment plaque (adjusted-OR = 1.67 [95%CI = 1.10-2.55], p = 0.017) and high-risk plaque presence (adjusted-OR 2.78 [95%CI = 1.06-7.29], p = 0.038); 2) greater anti-oxLDL titers (p = 0.020), which positively associated with TNF-alpha and likelihood of noncalcified, partially calcified and high-risk plaque presence only in patients with LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L (all p-for-interaction & LE;0.046); 3) increased lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol content (10.33% [8.11-12.54] versus 6.68% [6.10-7.25], p < 0.001), which positively associated with oxLDL (p < 0.001) and anti-oxLDL (p = 0.036); 4) higher interleukin-6 and PCSK9. No differences in CRP, ESR, or oxLDL were observed. Conclusion: RA patients with LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L had more coronary plaque, higher anti-oxLDL titers and anti-oxLDL associated with plaque only in this group. It is possible the observed paradoxical association of low LDL-C with greater atherosclerosis may be related to higher production of the oxidation-prone lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol and anti-oxLDL antibodies, resulting in increased vascular LDL uptake and plaque formation

Statins influence the relationship between ATP-binding cassette A1 membrane transporter-mediated cholesterol efflux capacity and coronary atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives: Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is the main antiatherogenic function of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). ATP-binding-cassette A1 (ABCA1) membrane transporter initiates cholesterol export from arterial macrophages to pre-β HDL particles fostering their maturation; in turn, those accept cholesterol through ABCG1-mediated export. Impaired pre-β HDL maturation may disrupt the collaborative function of the two transporters and adversely affect atherosclerosis. Statins exert atheroprotective functions systemically and locally on plaque. We here evaluated associations between ABCA1-CEC, coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk and the influence of statins on those relationships in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Evaluation with computed tomography angiography was undertaken in 140 patients and repeated in 99 after 6.9 ± 0.3 years. Events comprising cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndromes, stroke, claudication, revascularization and heart failure were recorded. ABCA1-CEC and ABCG1-CEC were evaluated in J774A.1 macrophages and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells respectively and expressed as percentage of effluxed over total intracellular cholesterol. Covariates in all cardiovascular event risk and plaque outcome models included atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Results: ABCA1-CEC negatively correlated with ABCG1-CEC (r = −0.167, p = 0.049). ABCA1-CEC associated with cardiovascular risk (adjusted hazard ratio 2.05 [95%CI 1.20–3.48] per standard deviation [SD] increment). There was an interaction of ABCA1-CEC with time-varying statin use (p = 0.038) such that current statin use inversely associated with risk only in patients with ABCA1-CEC below the upper tertile. ABCA1-CEC had no main effect on plaque or plaque progression; instead, ABCA1-CEC (per SD) associated with fewer baseline total plaques (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] 0.81, [95%CI 0.65–1.00]), noncalcified plaques (aRR 0.78 [95%CI 0.61–0.98]), and vulnerable low-attenuation plaques (aRR 0.41 [95%CI 0.23–0.74]) in statin users, and more low-attenuation plaques (aRR 1.91 [95%CI 1.18–3.08]) in nonusers (p-for-interaction = 0.018, 0.011, 0.025 and < 0.001 respectively). Moreover, ABCA1-CEC (per SD) associated with greater partially/fully-calcified plaque progression (adjusted odds ratio 3.07 [95%CI 1.20–7.86]) only in patients not exposed to statins during follow-up (p-for-interaction = 0.009). Conclusion: In patients with RA, higher ABCA1-CEC may reflect a proatherogenic state, associated with enhanced cardiovascular risk. Statin use may unmask the protective impact of ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux on plaque formation, progression and cardiovascular risk

Inflammation and immunomodulatory therapies influence the relationship between ATP-binding cassette A1 membrane transporter-mediated cholesterol efflux capacity and coronary atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) removes cholesterol from cells in atherosclerotic lesions, a function known as cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC). ATP-binding-cassette A1 (ABCA1) membrane transporter starts cholesterol transfer from macrophages to HDL particles. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), methotrexate and biologic disease modifying drugs (bDMARDs) are atheroprotective whereas corticosteroids and C-reactive protein (CRP) are proatherogenic. We evaluated the influence of these factors on the relationship of ABCA1-CEC with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. Methods: Atherosclerosis was evaluated with computed tomography angiography in 140 patients with RA and repeated in 99 after 6.9 ± 0.3 years. Events including acute coronary syndromes, stroke, cardiovascular death, claudication, revascularization, and heart failure were recorded. ABCA1-CEC was quantified in J774A.1 murine macrophages and reported as percentage of effluxed over intracellular cholesterol. Results: Higher ABCA1-CEC associated with (i) more calcified plaques at baseline only in patients with CRP>7 mg/L (median) (p-interaction = 0.001) and methotrexate nonusers (p-interaction = 0.037), and more partially-calcified plaques only in bDMARD nonusers (p-interaction = 0.029); (ii) fewer new calcified plaques in patients with below-median but not higher time-averaged CRP (p-interaction = 0.028); (iii) fewer new total and calcified plaques in prednisone unexposed but not patients exposed to prednisone during follow-up (p-interaction = 0.034 and 0.004) and (iv) more new plaques in baseline bDMARD nonusers and fewer in bDMARD users (p-interaction ≤ 0.001). Also, ABCA1-CEC associated with greater cardiovascular risk only in baseline prednisone users (p-interaction = 0.027). Conclusion: ABCA1-CEC associated with decreased atherosclerosis in patients with below-median baseline and time-averaged CRP and bDMARD use. Conversely, ABCA1-CEC associated with increased plaque in those with higher CRP, corticosteroid users, methotrexate nonusers, and bDMARD nonusers. While in well-treated and controlled disease ABCA1-CEC appears atheroprotective, in uncontrolled RA its action may be masked or fail to counteract the inflammation-driven proatherogenic state